ASSESSMENT OF RECEPTOR CONVERSION ROLE FOR ADVANCED BREAST CANCER ON THE CHEMORESISTANCE OCCURRENCE
ARTICLE PDF

Keywords

breast cancer
neoadjuvant chemotherapy
receptor conversion
chemoresistance

How to Cite

Movchan, O. V., Smolanka, I. I., Lyashenko, A. O., Loboda, A. D., Dosenko, I. V., & Ivankova, O. M. (2025). ASSESSMENT OF RECEPTOR CONVERSION ROLE FOR ADVANCED BREAST CANCER ON THE CHEMORESISTANCE OCCURRENCE. Clinical and Preventive Medicine, (3), 56-62. https://doi.org/10.31612/2616-4868.3.2025.07

Abstract

Introduction. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) is employed as an important step in the treatment of patients with breast cancer (BC). We do not have much information about the conversion of estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR) status in breast cancer (BC) patients after NC, or about its correlation with chemoresistance and prognosis. Not all clinics consistently determine receptor status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) and surgical intervention in breast cancer (BC) patients. However, this status may vary, making it critical to adjust the adjuvant treatment plan accordingly. Failure to do so may result in inadequate therapy and the development of chemoresistance.

Aim. To determine the effect of changes in receptor status at different stages of breast cancer treatment on the development of chemoresistance.

Materials and methods. Sixty patients with advanced breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) were enrolled in the study and divided into two groups: the receptor-stable group (30 patients, with no conversion in ER and PR receptor status before and after NAC) and the receptor-conversion group (30 patients, with conversion in either ER or PR status). Univariate analysis was used to compare 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) between the groups.

Results. The estimated 5-year DFS rate for patients in the receptor-stable group was significantly higher (22 patients, 73.7%) compared to the receptor-conversion group (16 patients, 55.2%, P = 0.015). In contrast, the estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) rates for patients with or without receptor conversion were not statistically different (80.0% vs. 72.4%, log-rank test, P = 0.587). In the univariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, patients with receptor conversion had worse DFS (hazard ratio, 1.995; 95% confidence interval, 1.130–3.521, P = 0.031).

Conclusions. We strongly recommend testing patients’ biomarkers at different stages of treatment and paying closer attention to those with receptor conversion. These patients require an individualised approach to therapy as part of comprehensive treatment. It is essential to determine hormonal status after neoadjuvant therapy, using postoperative tissue samples, as hormonal status may change and, accordingly, treatment strategies may need to be adjusted. This approach can help prevent the development of chemoresistance.

https://doi.org/10.31612/2616-4868.3.2025.07
ARTICLE PDF

References

Al-Saleh, K., Salah, T., Arafah, M., Husain, S., Al-Rikabi, A., & Abd El-Aziz, N. (2021). Prognostic significance of estrogen, progesterone and HER2 receptors' status conversion following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer: Results from a tertiary Cancer Center in Saudi Arabia. PloS one, 16(3), e0247802. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247802

Mohan, S. C., Walcott-Sapp, S., Lee, M. K., Srour, M. K., Kim, S., Amersi, F. F., Giuliano, A. E., & Chung, A. P. (2021). Alterations in Breast Cancer Biomarkers Following Neoadjuvant Therapy. Annals of surgical oncology, 28(11), 5907–5917. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-09814-1

Radosevic-Robin, N., Selenica, P., Zhu, Y., Won, H. H., Berger, M. F., Ferrando, L., Cocco, E., Privat, M., Ponelle-Chachuat, F., Abrial, C., Nabholtz, J. M., Penault-Llorca, F., Reis-Filho, J. S., & Scaltriti, M. (2021). Recurrence biomarkers of triple negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and anti-EGFR antibodies. NPJ breast cancer, 7(1), 124. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-021-00334-5

Schneider, J., Lee, H. J., Nam, S. J., Lee, S. J., Jung, J. H., Jung, S. H., Lim, S. T., Jeon, Y. W., & Gwak, H. (2020). Relative Survival Benefit by Hormonal Receptor Status of Adding Trastuzumab to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients. Journal of breast cancer, 23(3), 259–267. https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2020.23.e34

American Cancer Society. Last Revised: September 20, 2019 www.cancer.org › cancer

Yang, L., Zhong, X., Pu, T., Qiu, Y., Ye, F., & Bu, H. (2018). Clinical significance and prognostic value of receptor conversion in hormone receptor positive breast cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. World journal of surgical oncology, 16(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-018-1332-7

Smolanka, I. I., Movchan, O. V., Bagmut, I. Y., Sheremet, M. I., Kolisnyk, I. L., Dosenko, I. V., Lyashcnko, A. O., Ivankova, O. M., Loboda, A. D., & Shidlovskyi, O. V. (2023). Breast cancer relapses considering molecular biological characteristics. Journal of medicine and life, 16(1), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2022-0189

Asaoka, M., Gandhi, S., Ishikawa, T., & Takabe, K. (2020). Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Past, Present, and Future. Breast cancer : basic and clinical research, 14, 1178223420980377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1178223420980377

Guarneri, V., Broglio, K., Kau, S. W., Cristofanilli, M., Buzdar, A. U., Valero, V., Buchholz, T., Meric, F., Middleton, L., Hortobagyi, G. N., & Gonzalez-Angulo, A. M. (2006). Prognostic value of pathologic complete response after primary chemotherapy in relation to hormone receptor status and other factors. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 24(7), 1037–1044. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.02.6914

Movchan, O. V., Bagmut, I. Y., Shipko, A. F., Smolanka Senior, I. I., Sheremet, M. I., Kolisnyk, I. L., Bagmut, O. V., Lyashenko, A. O., Loboda, A. D., Ivankova, O. M., Dosenko, I. V., Lazaruk, O. V., Gyrla, Y. V., & Bilookyi, O. V. (2022). HER2/positive and HER2/low in inflammatory breast cancer recurrence. Journal of medicine and life, 15(12), 1573–1578. https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2022-0213

Rey-Vargas, L., Mejía-Henao, J. C., Sanabria-Salas, M. C., & Serrano-Gomez, S. J. (2020). Effect of neoadjuvant therapy on breast cancer biomarker profile. BMC cancer, 20(1), 675. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07179-4

Du, L., Yau, C., Brown-Swigart, L., Gould, R., Krings, G., Hirst, G. L., Bedrosian, I., Layman, R. M., Carter, J. M., Klein, M., Venters, S., Shad, S., van der Noordaa, M., Chien, A. J., Haddad, T., Isaacs, C., Pusztai, L., Albain, K., Nanda, R., Tripathy, D., … Symmans, W. F. (2021). Predicted sensitivity to endocrine therapy for stage II-III hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer before chemo-endocrine therapy. Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 32(5), 642–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2021.02.011

Zattarin, E., Leporati, R., Ligorio, F., Lobefaro, R., Vingiani, A., Pruneri, G., & Vernieri, C. (2020). Hormone Receptor Loss in Breast Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms, Clinical Settings, and Therapeutic Implications. Cells, 9(12), 2644. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9122644

Pasha, N., & Turner, N. C. (2021). Understanding and overcoming tumor heterogeneity in metastatic breast cancer treatment. Nature cancer, 2(7), 680–692. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43018-021-00229-1

Riggio A, Varley K, Welm A. (2021). The lingering mysteries of metastatic recurrence in breast cancer. Br J Cancer, 124, 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-01161-4

Del Mastro, L., Mansutti, M., Bisagni, G., Ponzone, R., Durando, A., Amaducci, L., Campadelli, E., Cognetti, F., Frassoldati, A., Michelotti, A., Mura, S., Urracci, Y., Sanna, G., Gori, S., De Placido, S., Garrone, O., Fabi, A., Barone, C., Tamberi, S., Bighin, C., … Gruppo Italiano Mammella investigators (2021). Extended therapy with letrozole as adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal patients with early-stage breast cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. The Lancet. Oncology, 22(10), 1458–1467. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00352-1

Zhao, W., Sun, L., Dong, G., Wang, X., Jia, Y., & Tong, Z. (2021). Receptor conversion impacts outcomes of different molecular subtypes of primary breast cancer. Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 13, 17588359211012982. https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359211012982

Parinyanitikul, N., Lei, X., Chavez-MacGregor, M., Liu, S., Mittendorf, E. A., Litton, J. K., Woodward, W., Zhang, A. H., Hortobagyi, G. N., Valero, V., Meric-Bernstam, F., & Gonzalez-Angulo, A. M. (2015). Receptor status change from primary to residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and analysis of survival outcomes. Clinical breast cancer, 15(2), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2014.09.006

Ahn, S., Woo, J. W., Lee, K., & Park, S. Y. (2020). HER2 status in breast cancer: changes in guidelines and complicating factors for interpretation. Journal of pathology and translational medicine, 54(1), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2019.11.03

Wangchinda, P., & Ithimakin, S. (2016). Factors that predict recurrence later than 5 years after initial treatment in operable breast cancer. World journal of surgical oncology, 14(1), 223. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-0988-0

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.